What all these words have in common when it comes to the subject-verb chord is that the singular form takes on a singular concordance and that the plural form is pluralistic, whether the form in question accidentally ends in one-s or not. Don`t add -s to the verb if two themes are through and connected. Why this is true: the indefinite plural pronouns “few” and “several” take the plural verbs “say” or “are”. In addition, it is important to understand that the same sentence may consist of more than one clause. If there is more than one clause in a sentence, there is more than one predicate. Any predicate must agree with the purpose of the clause to which it belongs when there is an object in the clause. The same applies to any business name that ends in s or has a compound name (z.B. Food Basics, Long -McQuade), as well as for any association of inanimate objects treated as a single unit (for example. B meat and potatoes are considered a dish; see Subj-v Agr. Rule 2 below for more connections). Similarly, a few words of special cases, which look like plural because they end rather with s, rather take singular pronouns and verbs, especially names of games and disciplines or fields of study, as well as dollar amounts, distances and amounts of time: in the first erroneous example above, the proximity of “experts” and “contests” with the main verb (form of being) probably made the author think that the verb must be plural. It`s too much.
However, the true nobisse of the subject of the sentence is “vodka”, which is singular and therefore takes the singular verb “is”, no matter what happens in between. In the second false sentence is the grammatically subject of singular “winners”, so the main verb should be the singular “is,” not the plural. A berming interjection between the subject and the verb, even if it seems to pluralize the subject with “so,” “with,” “more” or something like that, does not technically make a composite subject (see Subj-v Agr. Rule 2 below for more connections). Countless nouns are always treated as singularly when it comes to a verb-subject agreement: however, the passive voice is often overused and abused. It is a more verbal and less direct way of looking at what happened as an active voice, and so it is a weaker and less honest construct than the active voice. Some authors use it to use others to avoid saying “I” after they have been told by teachers at an older school of thought who tried to play the role of the individual writer in what this writer says, not “I.”